Memory-efficient A* heuristics for multiple sequence alignment
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The time and space needs of an A * search are strongly in-fluenced by the quality of the heuristic evaluation function. Usually there is a trade-off since better heuristics may re-quire more time and/or space to evaluate. Multiple sequence alignment is an important application for single-agent search. The traditional heuristic uses multiple pairwise alignments that require relatively little space. Three-way alignments produce better heuristics, but they are not used in practice due to the large space requirements. This paper presents a memory-efficient way to represent three-way heuristics as an octree. The required portions of the octree are computed on demand. The octree-supported three-way heuristics result in such a substantial reduction to the size of the A * open list that they offset the additional space and time requirements for the three-way alignments. The resulting multiple sequence align-ments are both faster and use less memory than using A * with traditional pairwise heuristics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it