MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2044336149 · doi:10.1080/01639625.2011.584277

Cyclical Role-Playing and Stigma: Exploring the Challenges of Stereotype Performance among Exotic Dancers

2012· article· en· W2044336149 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueDeviant Behavior · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicSexuality, Behavior, and Technology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClubReputationStigma (botany)PsychologyEthnographySociologySocial psychologyGender studiesSocial science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This article maintains that there is a cycle existent between common stereotypes about strippers and the images that strippers themselves put forth at work. Each of these elements reinforces the other. For some strippers, this cycle involves role-playing at work in order to put forth a profitable image, coupled with either additional role-playing outside of the club in the avoidance of stigmatization or the endurance of social maltreatment. The stigmatization that comes with common stereotypes is yet another form of disempowerment stemming from this profession. Acknowledgments The author thanks Dr. Anne J. Goldberg of Hendrix College for her guidance in conducting the research that went into this project, as well as Dr. Mindy S. Bradley-Engen of the University of Arkansas for her input pre-publication. Notes 1The term "dancer" is synonymous with "stripper" throughout this article. 2The term "stigma" as it is used throughout this article refers to an attribute, behavior, or reputation that is socially discrediting. 3My research concerns only women who work as exotic dancers due to the absence of male strip clubs in Arkansas as well as a deficiency in literature concerning men who work as strippers. 4The term "society" as it is used throughout this article should be understood as referring to the entirety of the United States and Canada. Although my ethnographic research was conducted entirely within the state of Arkansas, theories from my literature review that correspond to my informants' experiences have been derived from this broader geographical scope. 5By contrast to strippers, go-go dancers were not expected to remove clothing. 6The term "employ" is used loosely here; dancers are widely considered to be independent contractors, since they pay a fee to the club each night that they work for usage of that venue. Dancers do not earn a wage of any sort, but rather claim the money they make from patrons' on-stage tips and purchases of private dances. (However, there is currently ongoing debate regarding whether or not a stripper actually meets the legal definition of "independent contractor" and should thus be excluded from earning wages.) 7Referring to lips, nipples, and genitalia of persons in the strip club (persons of any ethnicity, actually, despite the term's inaccuracy in this respect). 8To clarify, I am passing no judgment upon "the world's oldest profession," but am merely pointing out that many people have incorrectly come to associate stripping with a profession that it is not. 9For the sake of maintaining anonymity, fake stage names are used throughout the article. 10The names of venues have been changed as well, in correspondence with the claim put forth by multiple informants that "it's another world" inside the club. 11While research as a motivation for dancing may be viewed as a somewhat limiting factor in terms of gaining an "emic perspective," I did find myself in situations at work that elicited emotional responses paralleling other dancers' reported experiences. Upon seeing that few dancers actually identified themselves as "strippers," Ronai, a dancer-researcher, wrote, "Perhaps believing that you are not really a dancer is part of being a dancer. Maybe I am a 'real' dancer after all" (Ronai 1992:123). 12It is important to note here that prior research has found that it is not uncommon for dancers to have been, at various points in their lives, victims of poverty and/or sexual abuse of various types and degrees (Wesely 2003). My point here is not that dancers are divorced from any form of victimhood, but that they are not especially victimized in terms of their being objectified women. Moreover, some dancers claim that they feel "empowered" by the attention that they receive while at work (Wood 2000; Forsyth and Deshotels Citation1998), which certainly is a result of disempowering social conditioning that teaches women that they are to be rewarded based on their physical attractiveness. Additional informationNotes on contributorsLara Catherine Morrow LARA CATHERINE MORROW obtained her Bachelors of Arts Degree from Hendrix College in Conway, Arkansas with a double-major in Anthropology and Sociology and in Spanish. Her research interests include the intersection of anthropology and sociology, with an emphasis on deviant subcultures. Women's sexuality, popular portrayals of women, and popular portrayals of Hispanic cultures are specific interests of hers within this realm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.196
Threshold uncertainty score0.593

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.138
GPT teacher head0.327
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it