MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2044363995 · doi:10.1080/01496395.2015.1009116

Optimization of Chemical Cleaning for Improvement of Membrane Performance and Fouling Control in Drinking Water Treatment

2015· article· en· W2044363995 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueSeparation Science and Technology · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMembrane Separation Technologies
Canadian institutionsThunder Bay Regional Health Sciences CentreLakehead University
FundersNational Research Foundation of KoreaNorthern Ontario Heritage Fund Corporation
KeywordsChemistryCitric acidSodium hypochloriteFoulingMembraneMembrane permeabilityPermeability (electromagnetism)Membrane foulingWater treatmentChromatographyHypochloriteChemical engineeringPulp and paper industryInorganic chemistryWaste managementOrganic chemistryBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A pilot-scale study using a ZeeWeed® 1000 membrane pilot plant was conducted to optimize the use of sodium hypochlorite (NaClO) and citric acid for membrane permeability recovery and membrane fouling control in drinking water treatment. Backwash was the most effective strategy for permeability recovery and under the same NaClO dose, a lower concentration combined with a longer soak time achieved a higher permeability recovery. Organics were the major foulants responsible for permeability decrease. Inorganic foulants surprisingly increased after NaClO cleaning. Similarly, a lower pH was more effective in permeability recovery than a higher concentration of citric acid.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.152
Threshold uncertainty score0.249

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it