MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2044512258 · doi:10.2118/162866-ms

Case-Based Reasoning Technology Used to Provide Early Indications of Potential NPT-Related Problems while Drilling the Viking

2012· article· en· W2044512258 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Canadian Unconventional Resources Conference · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicDrilling and Well Engineering
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMount Royal University
KeywordsComputer scienceSituation awarenessValue propositionField (mathematics)Situational ethicsData scienceEmerging technologiesIndustrial engineeringRisk analysis (engineering)Computer securityArtificial intelligenceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract There is a considerable value proposition for drilling personnel to be able to use real-time data and have an intelligent technology scan for potential problems before they are realized. To then further offer resolution options for the potential problem is an even greater value proposition. Use of automated intelligent technologies to interpret data and alert users of potential problems is in existence for many commercial and industrial applications. These technologies are frequently employed in surveillance systems such as traffic control, security, and internet usage. The historic challenge for most of these technologies in field applications is that many of the problem scenarios have varying degrees of parameter differences. As such, rule-based technologies have not met expectations. This challenge has been resolved through use of an intelligent technology that evaluates and ranks a problem scenario’s parameters based on case similarity. In other words, this technology compares the relative differences of problem parameters to baseline case history problem parameters. This approach is a much better representation of reality in the field, where no two problems are exactly the same – they are only similar. An intelligent real-time technology utilizing case-based reasoning can now be deployed in drilling operations to help recognize and mitigate non-productive time problems before they occur, thereby improving overall drilling efficiency. This software technology recalls human and situational experience across rigs, assets and regions. By continuously monitoring the real-time data-streams from ongoing drilling operations, it compares the current situation with past experience (cases). When the current situation is similar to a case, an alert is sent to users and the case is displayed along with lessons learned, advice and best practices. This technology was successfully deployed in a proof of concept with junior oil company, drilling the Viking formation. This paper highlights the theory behind the technology, deployment and integration with the junior oil company, and the results of the project, including a case study in which the technology sent an alert of a potential stuck pipe incident and suggested remedial actions to address the problem before it occurred. This paper concludes with how the technology can be continually adapted to new downhole drilling challenges.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.059
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it