MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2044903636 · doi:10.1139/v06-161

Expanding the scope of the Newman–Kwart rearrangement — A computational assessment

2006· article· en· W2044903636 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Chemistry · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicOrganic Chemistry Cycloaddition Reactions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryTransition stateScope (computer science)Transposition (logic)Ab initioComputational chemistryDensity functional theorySulfurOxygen atomOxygenStereochemistryMoleculeOrganic chemistryCatalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Newman–Kwart rearrangement (NKR) has been studied for a variety of thioncarbamates using density functional (B3LYP) and ab initio (MP2) methodologies. The results confirm and support the generally accepted mechanism that the NKR proceeds through a four-membered cyclic transition state. The presence of a π system connected via an oxygen linkage to a thiocarbonyl functionality is identified as a crucial structural element for the NKR. The calculations further suggest that the NKR might also be feasible for thioncarbamates derived from π system containing groups other than phenols such as ethenol, ethenediol, and butadienol. The NKR is compared with the Schönberg rearrangements of thioncarbonates.Key words: density functional calculations, localized orbital locator, oxygen–sulfur transposition, thiols.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.131
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it