Evaluation of Pressurized Cold Bend Pipe Body Tensile Fractures Under Bending Loads
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cold bending is applied at locations where the pipeline direction has to be changed in a horizontal or vertical plane. The process of cold bending usually results in residual stresses as well as changes in the material properties at the vicinity of the cold bend location which makes the study of the mechanical behaviour of cold bends indispensable. Due to discontinuous permafrost in arctic regions as well as slope instabilities and earthquakes cold bends within pipelines constructed in such locations can be subjected to significant tensile or compressive forces. Experimental studies were carried out by Sen et al [1][2][3]in order to investigate the buckling behaviour of pressurized cold bends. In these experiments the curvature of the cold bend is increased in the presence of a constant internal pressure. In their experimental study a total of 8 full scale tests were conducted with a variety of pipe diameters, diameter to wall thickness ratio and steel grade. In this set of full scale tests one of the pipes with grade X65 failed due to fracture at the extrados after buckling and formation of wrinkles at the intrados[1]. Our previous work [4], [5] on this subject showed the simulations of this case using finite element analysis. These simulations demonstrated that indeed pipe body tensile side fracture can be observed for this particular pipe specification. Whereby the tension side fractures are expected starting from a specific internal pressure level. The simulation results showed that the equivalent plastic strain values at the cold bend extrados increase dramatically starting from a certain level of applied curvature in load cases with an internal pressure higher than a transition value. In this paper the effect of steel grade on this transition from compressive to tensile failure is investigated. Parametric studies are conducted for the entire range of steel grades tested in the experimental study of Sen et al. It is found that there is a linear proportionality between the steel grade and the transition internal pressure for steel grades between X60 and X80.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".