MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2045527035 · doi:10.1504/ijcnds.2008.020710

Periodically scheduled burst flows in optical burst switching networks

2008· article· en· W2045527035 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Communication Networks and Distributed Systems · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Optical Network Technologies
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceOptical burst switchingBurst switchingComputer networkTelecommunicationsWavelength-division multiplexingOptical performance monitoringOptoelectronicsTransmission delayNetwork packetPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Providing flexible quality of service (QoS) for multiple classes of traffics is one of the important challenges in the design of optical burst switching (OBS) networks. In this paper, we propose a novel bandwidth reservation scheme for periodically scheduled bursts. Multi-protocol label switching (MPLS) is used to construct reliable burst delivery channels across the network. Meanwhile, best effort bursts are transferred using one-way offset signalling to improve the wavelength efficiency. Our hybrid OBS architecture provides flow level QoS control without compromising the performance of best effort bursts. Simulation results show that our approach is better than early dropping schemes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.764
Threshold uncertainty score0.755

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it