Polystyrene foams. III. Structure–tensile properties relationships
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract In the previous two parts of this series of articles, the relations among the foaming conditions, microstructure, and impact properties of expanded microcellular polystyrene (EPS) were discussed. In this article, the effects of the foaming conditions and structure on the tensile properties of EPS were investigated. A systematic investigation was performed based on a statistical experimental design. Various processing conditions were used and a wide range of cellular structures was developed. Regression analysis was conducted on the data and expressions were developed to quantify the relationship between the tensile properties and the cellular structure. Foaming time and foaming temperature were the most important processing parameters influencing the tensile modulus and strength. The tensile modulus and strength increased with an increasing foam density, but they decreased slightly when the cell size increased. Two different approaches were used to develop models relating the modulus to the foam density of EPS. Both models fitted the experimental data quite well. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 90: 1427–1434, 2003
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".