Nanocrystallization effect on the surface electron work function of copper and its corrosion behaviour
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The effect of grain size at micro- and nanoscale on the surface electron stability of copper as reflected by the electron work function (EWF) was investigated. In the ambient environment, the surface reactivity increases with decreasing grain size in the micron range, but decreases when entering the nanometre range. When in a solution with associated passivation, grain refinement enhances resistance to corrosion. However, the situation is reversed when no passivation is involved. In the former case, the improved surface stability and corrosion behaviour caused by nanocrystallization can be attributed to the formation of a more protective passive film. In the latter case, nanocrystallization accelerates material dissolution resulting from enhanced activity of surface electrons at high-density grain boundaries. The correlation between EWF and the corrosion behaviour, as well as the mechanisms involved, are discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it