On the Transient Behavior of Large-Scale Distribution Networks During Automatic Feeder Reconfiguration
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The paper presents an in-depth analysis of the automatic reconfiguration and self-healing principles of the next generation (3G) smart grid of a real metropolitan distribution network. The large network is to be divided dynamically and remotely controlled into three smaller subnetworks to further increase the reliability of electrical power distribution secondary networks. When one subsection is experiencing difficulties, there is no longer the need to de-energize the entire network. A time-domain (EMTP) model has been developed and validated by comparing simulations with recordings of actual transient events. Different switching and fault scenarios are investigated using this model. Analysis of the results provides important conclusions on equipment rating, relay protection coordination, voltage regulation, switching and operation strategies which are discussed in the paper. A subset of these results is presented for illustration. This extensive study of a complex urban network suggests that: 1) before implementation of smart grid principles, it would be prudent to supplement steady-state analysis with time-domain analysis to avoid problems, such as installation of improperly rated equipment, and improper relay-protection coordination; and 2) EMTP-type programs may be used to conduct the time-domain analysis, despite the enormous number of elements contained in an urban network.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".