Patients with primary brain tumors as organ donors: Case report and review of the literature
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Malignancy is considered a contra-indication to organ donation, with a few possible exceptions. We present the case of a child with fatal intracranial hemorrhage from a primary brain tumor (PBT) whose organs were denied for transplant after recovery. We review the literature of organ donors with PBTs in the context of the current organ shortage and discuss the implications for the practicing oncologist. Transmission of donor brain tumor to organ recipients has been documented but the incidence appears to be very low. Risk factors for tumor transmission include underlying donor tumor histology, history of craniotomy and/or shunt placement, use of systemic chemotherapy and radiation therapy, and duration of disease prior to donation. Ongoing data collection by national registries will provide more information on the potential risk to organ recipients. It may be appropriate to expand the donor pool to include donors with PBTs in certain situations. The transplantation team ultimately decides upon the use of organs from specific donors. Many families will appreciate the opportunity to donate specific tissues even if solid organ transplantation is prohibited.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it