MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2046364808 · doi:10.1071/sr07024

Categorisation of soils based on potassium reserves and production systems: implications in K management

2007· article· en· W2046364808 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSoil Research · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicClay minerals and soil interactions
Canadian institutionsPotashCorp (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInceptisolVertisolOxisolSoil waterAgronomyAlfisolEnvironmental scienceEntisolSoil scienceBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Crop fertilisation with potassium in rainfed agriculture in India is not practised, merely on the assumption that Indian soils are rich in potassium and crops do not need external K supply. However, under continuous cropping in rainfed regions, huge crop K removals are reported, up to 150–200 kg/ha annually, depending upon amount and distribution of rainfall and biomass production. Thus, most of the crops essentially deplete soil K reserves. The present study evaluates the soil K reserves under diverse rainfed production systems and categorises rainfed soils based on different soil K fractions. Depth-wise sampling was done from 21 locations across different soil types under 8 production systems, and various fractions of soil K were determined. Total K was highest in Inceptisols (1.60–2.28%), followed by Aridisols (1.45–1.84%), Vertisols and Vertic sub-groups (0.24–1.72%), and Alfisols and Oxisols (0.30–1.86%), showing a wide variation within each group. Nonexchangeable K reserves were found in a proportionate manner to total K in most of the soil profile. Unlike nonexchangeable K reserves, Vertisols had higher exchangeable K than Inceptisols and Alfisols/Oxisols. Nonexchageable K showed significant positive correlation with total K in Inceptisols and Vertisols, whereas it was non-significant in Alfisols/Oxisosls. However, significant positive correlations were recorded with exchangeable K and nonexchangeable K in all soil types, indicating the dynamic equilibrium between 2 soil K fractions. Nonexchangeable K reserves were included along with exchangeable K in categorising soils into 9 groups for evolving better strategies to manage soil K fertility in rainfed agriculture in India. Finger millet and groundnut crops at Bangalore and Anantapur regions (category I) need immediate attention on K nutrition, as these soils are low in both exchangeable and nonexchangeable K. Similarly, crops grown on soils of S.K. Nagar, Ballowal-Saunkri, and Rakh-Dhiansar, with low exchangeable K and medium nonexchangeable K, would need K fertilisation as these crops (maize and pearlmillet) are K-exhaustive (category II). Pearl millet and upland rice in category III and cotton in category IV need K additions at critical stages. Upland rice in category V needs a maintenance dose of K. In category VI, cereal crops may not need K additions immediately as they have medium exchangeable K and high nonexchangeable K. Long-term sorghum cropping may need K supply after few years (category VII). Soils in category VIII are adequate in nonexchangeable K and medium exchangeable K and the crops, groundnut, cotton, sorghum, and soybean, may not need external K immediately. For soils in category IX, K fertilisation is not required to the crops (sorghum and soybean) as these soils have high exchangeable and nonexchangeable K.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.748
Threshold uncertainty score0.404

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.101
GPT teacher head0.406
Teacher spread0.304 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it