MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2046364808 · doi:10.1071/sr07024

Categorisation of soils based on potassium reserves and production systems: implications in K management

2007· article· en· W2046364808 on OpenAlexaff
Ch. Srinivasarao, K. P. R. Vittal, K. N. Tiwari, P. N. Gajbhiye, Sumanta Kundu

Bibliographic record

VenueSoil Research · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicClay minerals and soil interactions
Canadian institutionsPotashCorp (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInceptisolVertisolOxisolSoil waterAgronomyAlfisolEnvironmental scienceEntisolSoil scienceBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Crop fertilisation with potassium in rainfed agriculture in India is not practised, merely on the assumption that Indian soils are rich in potassium and crops do not need external K supply. However, under continuous cropping in rainfed regions, huge crop K removals are reported, up to 150–200 kg/ha annually, depending upon amount and distribution of rainfall and biomass production. Thus, most of the crops essentially deplete soil K reserves. The present study evaluates the soil K reserves under diverse rainfed production systems and categorises rainfed soils based on different soil K fractions. Depth-wise sampling was done from 21 locations across different soil types under 8 production systems, and various fractions of soil K were determined. Total K was highest in Inceptisols (1.60–2.28%), followed by Aridisols (1.45–1.84%), Vertisols and Vertic sub-groups (0.24–1.72%), and Alfisols and Oxisols (0.30–1.86%), showing a wide variation within each group. Nonexchangeable K reserves were found in a proportionate manner to total K in most of the soil profile. Unlike nonexchangeable K reserves, Vertisols had higher exchangeable K than Inceptisols and Alfisols/Oxisols. Nonexchageable K showed significant positive correlation with total K in Inceptisols and Vertisols, whereas it was non-significant in Alfisols/Oxisosls. However, significant positive correlations were recorded with exchangeable K and nonexchangeable K in all soil types, indicating the dynamic equilibrium between 2 soil K fractions. Nonexchangeable K reserves were included along with exchangeable K in categorising soils into 9 groups for evolving better strategies to manage soil K fertility in rainfed agriculture in India. Finger millet and groundnut crops at Bangalore and Anantapur regions (category I) need immediate attention on K nutrition, as these soils are low in both exchangeable and nonexchangeable K. Similarly, crops grown on soils of S.K. Nagar, Ballowal-Saunkri, and Rakh-Dhiansar, with low exchangeable K and medium nonexchangeable K, would need K fertilisation as these crops (maize and pearlmillet) are K-exhaustive (category II). Pearl millet and upland rice in category III and cotton in category IV need K additions at critical stages. Upland rice in category V needs a maintenance dose of K. In category VI, cereal crops may not need K additions immediately as they have medium exchangeable K and high nonexchangeable K. Long-term sorghum cropping may need K supply after few years (category VII). Soils in category VIII are adequate in nonexchangeable K and medium exchangeable K and the crops, groundnut, cotton, sorghum, and soybean, may not need external K immediately. For soils in category IX, K fertilisation is not required to the crops (sorghum and soybean) as these soils have high exchangeable and nonexchangeable K.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.101
GPT teacher head0.406
Teacher spread0.304 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations39
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSoil ResearchSame topicClay minerals and soil interactionsFrench-language works237,207