MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2046405851 · doi:10.1287/moor.2013.0590

Exploiting Known Structures to Approximate Normal Cones

2013· article· en· W2046405851 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMathematics of Operations Research · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Optimization Algorithms Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan CampusUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOracleMathematicsSimplexConstraint (computer-aided design)Set (abstract data type)Independence (probability theory)Cone (formal languages)Mathematical optimizationDegeneracy (biology)Function (biology)Key (lock)Applied mathematicsAlgorithmCombinatoricsComputer scienceGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The normal cone to a constraint set plays a key role in optimization theory, algorithms, and applications. We consider the question of how to approximate the normal cone to a set under the assumption that the set is provided through an oracle function or collection of oracle functions, but contains some exploitable structure. We provide a new simplex gradient-based approximation technique that works for sets defined through a finite number of oracle-based functions. We further present novel results showing that, under a non-degeneracy condition, approximating normal cones to intersections of sets is possible by taking sums of approximations. Finally, we provide numerical results that exemplify the accuracy of the simplex gradient approximation when it is applicable, and the failure of this technique when a linear independence constraint qualification is not met.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.546
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.174
GPT teacher head0.452
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it