MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2046449240 · doi:10.2118/100059-ms

A Single-Shot Method for Capillary Pressure Curve Measurement Using Centrifuge and Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging

2006· article· en· W2046449240 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE/DOE Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNMR spectroscopy and applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsCentrifugeCapillary pressureCapillary actionMechanicsSaturation (graph theory)Materials scienceChemistryNuclear magnetic resonanceOpticsPhysicsPorous mediumComposite materialMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The centrifuge method for capillary pressure curve measurement involves increasing the centrifuge speed in steps and measuring the liquid expelled from a short core plug, at equilibrium, for each step. However, the traditional methods for deducing approximate solutions for the capillary pressure curve are based on the assumption that the capillary pressure is zero at the outflow end of the core. In addition, the traditional centrifuge methods for capillary pressure measurement are time consuming. A full capillary pressure curve requires approximately 10 different rotational speeds. We have observed for most sedimentary rocks that the experimental magnetic resonance free induction decay is single exponential and the effective transverse relaxation time (T2*) is largely insensitive to fluid saturation. These features ensure that Centric Scan SPRITE (single-point ramped imaging with T1 enhancement) is a quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) method, since its local image intensity is directly proportional to the local fluid content. We propose a single-shot method to measure the capillary pressure curve of a long rock core using a single-speed centrifuge experiment and one-dimensional Centric Scan SPRITE MRI to determine the fluid saturation distribution, S(r), along the length of the core. A full capillary pressure curve can be directly determined by the relation of S(r) and the capillary pressure distribution, Pc(r), along the length of the core. The single-shot method, employing a desktop centrifuge and a desktop permanent magnet based one-dimensional MRI instrument, has been applied to measure the primary drainage, imbibition, and secondary drainage capillary pressure curves for reservoir rocks. The proposed method for determining the capillary pressure curve is rapid, cheap, and precise. The capillary pressure curve can be obtained straightforwardly with about 40 data points. The duration of the experiment is approximately 10 times less than the traditional method. Since only a single moderate rotational speed is employed, the outflow boundary condition can be maintained, and the effect of gravity can be neglected. In addition, the long rock cores employed for the single-shot method result in a relatively small radial effect.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.515
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it