MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2046449240 · doi:10.2118/100059-ms

A Single-Shot Method for Capillary Pressure Curve Measurement Using Centrifuge and Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging

2006· article· en· W2046449240 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Q. Chen, B. J. Balcom

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE/DOE Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNMR spectroscopy and applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsCentrifugeCapillary pressureCapillary actionMechanicsSaturation (graph theory)Materials scienceChemistryNuclear magnetic resonanceOpticsPhysicsPorous mediumComposite materialMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The centrifuge method for capillary pressure curve measurement involves increasing the centrifuge speed in steps and measuring the liquid expelled from a short core plug, at equilibrium, for each step. However, the traditional methods for deducing approximate solutions for the capillary pressure curve are based on the assumption that the capillary pressure is zero at the outflow end of the core. In addition, the traditional centrifuge methods for capillary pressure measurement are time consuming. A full capillary pressure curve requires approximately 10 different rotational speeds. We have observed for most sedimentary rocks that the experimental magnetic resonance free induction decay is single exponential and the effective transverse relaxation time (T2*) is largely insensitive to fluid saturation. These features ensure that Centric Scan SPRITE (single-point ramped imaging with T1 enhancement) is a quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) method, since its local image intensity is directly proportional to the local fluid content. We propose a single-shot method to measure the capillary pressure curve of a long rock core using a single-speed centrifuge experiment and one-dimensional Centric Scan SPRITE MRI to determine the fluid saturation distribution, S(r), along the length of the core. A full capillary pressure curve can be directly determined by the relation of S(r) and the capillary pressure distribution, Pc(r), along the length of the core. The single-shot method, employing a desktop centrifuge and a desktop permanent magnet based one-dimensional MRI instrument, has been applied to measure the primary drainage, imbibition, and secondary drainage capillary pressure curves for reservoir rocks. The proposed method for determining the capillary pressure curve is rapid, cheap, and precise. The capillary pressure curve can be obtained straightforwardly with about 40 data points. The duration of the experiment is approximately 10 times less than the traditional method. Since only a single moderate rotational speed is employed, the outflow boundary condition can be maintained, and the effect of gravity can be neglected. In addition, the long rock cores employed for the single-shot method result in a relatively small radial effect.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSPE/DOE Symposium on Improved Oil RecoverySame topicNMR spectroscopy and applicationsFrench-language works237,207