Stationary Solutions of a Volume-Filling Chemotaxis Model with Logistic Growth and Their Stability
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, we derive the conditions for the existence of stationary solutions (i.e., nonconstant steady states) of a volume-filling chemotaxis model with logistic growth over a bounded domain subject to homogeneous Neumann boundary conditions. At the same time, we show that the same system without the chemotaxis term does not admit pattern formations. Moreover, based on an explicit formula for the stationary solutions, which is derived by asymptotic bifurcation analysis, we establish the stability criteria and find a selection mechanism of the principal wave modes for the stable stationary solution by estimating the leading term of the principal eigenvalue. We show that all bifurcations except the one at the first location of the bifurcation parameter are unstable, and if the pattern is stable, then its principal wave mode must be a positive integer which minimizes the bifurcation parameter. For a special case where the carrying capacity is one half, we find a necessary and sufficient condition for the stability of pattern solutions. Numerical simulations are presented, on the one hand, to illustrate and fit our analytical results and, on the other hand, to demonstrate a variety of interesting spatio-temporal patterns, such as chaotic dynamics and the merging process, which motivate an interesting direction to pursue in the future.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it