MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2046653691 · doi:10.1080/09544820701376654

Parameter design considering the impact of design changes on downstream processes based upon the Taguchi method

2008· article· en· W2046653691 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Engineering Design · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicManufacturing Process and Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTaguchi methodsDownstream (manufacturing)Design of experimentsEngineering design processProcess (computing)Probabilistic designEstimation theoryEngineeringNoise (video)Pipeline (software)Process variableDesign processReliability engineeringComputer scienceMathematicsWork in processMechanical engineeringStatisticsAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This research introduces a new systematic approach for parameter design considering the impact of design changes on downstream processes. In this approach, design parameters with potential changes are modelled as noise parameters, while design parameters without potential changes are described as controllable parameters. The Taguchi method is employed to identify the robust design whose downstream process is the least sensitive to design parameter value changes. Since design parameter changes are usually associated with probabilities, the Taguchi method is modified in this research considering the probabilities of noise parameters. Estimation of potential process change cost due to potential design parameter value changes is also studied. A case study in pipeline engineering design and construction has been conducted to demonstrate the effectiveness of this new parameter design approach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.777
Threshold uncertainty score0.700

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it