MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2046747090 · doi:10.2118/118350-ms

Advances in Tight Gas Completions - Noel Tight Gas Project

2008· article· en· W2046747090 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueAbu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition and Conference · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
Canadian institutionsBP (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTight gasPetroleum engineeringExploitWellboreCompletion (oil and gas wells)Reservoir modelingGeologyDrillingUnconventional oilNatural gas fieldPermeability (electromagnetism)Reservoir simulationComputer scienceHydraulic fracturingEngineeringNatural gasOil shaleMechanical engineeringPaleontologyChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The Noel project has successfully employed unconventional fracing approaches and open hole horizontal wells to begin development of the Cadomin Formation in the Noel field in Canada. The Cadomin is a very difficult reservoir to exploit given that the reservoir is under pressured, has very low permeability and porosity. The formation is also deep and the drilling is made expensive by the abrasive nature and hardness of the rocks. The project appraisal team made extensive use of reservoir simulation, Microseismic frac mapping and production logging to understand the reservoir and the well performance in order to optimize the well design. A "do learn do" approach has allow the Noel team to make several step changes in well performance during the project appraisal phase.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.217
Threshold uncertainty score0.652

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it