MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2046789176 · doi:10.1094/cm-2004-0301-09-rv

Arbuscular Mycorrhiza Inoculum to Support Sustainable Cropping Systems

2004· article· en· W2046789176 on OpenAlexaff
Yolande Dalpé, M. Monreal

Bibliographic record

VenueCrop Management · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicMycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyAgronomyAgricultureNutrientSymbiosisBeneficial organismTillageGlomeromycotaCroppingArbuscular mycorrhizalMicroorganismEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Arbuscular mycorrhizae (AM) are symbiotic associations, formed between plants and soil fungi that play an essential role in plant growth, plant protection, and soil quality. The AM fungi expand their filaments in soil and plant roots. This filamentous network promote bi‐directional nutrient movement where soil nutrients and water move to the plant and plant photosynthates flow to the fungal network. AM fungi are ubiquitous in the soil and can form symbiosis with most terrestrial plants including major crops, cereals, vegetables, and horticultural plants. In agriculture, several factors, such as host crop dependency to mycorrhizal colonization, tillage system, fertilizer application, and mycorrhizal fungi inoculum's potential can affect plant response and plant benefits from mycorrhizae. Due to their obligate symbiotic status, AM fungi need to associate with plant for growth and proliferation. Consequently, the cultivation of AM fungal strains and the maintenance of reference collections require methodologies and infrastructures quite different from those used with other microbial collections and inoculum production. Interest in AM fungi propagation for agriculture is increasing due to their role in the promotion of plant health, in soil nutrition improvement, and soil aggregate stability. The comprehensive life cycle of AM fungi and methods currently used for the propagation of inoculum and the maintenance of in vivo and in vitro source collections are described. Methods and regulations of large‐scale production of commercial inoculum that provide users with products of high quality and efficiency are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations100
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCrop ManagementSame topicMycorrhizal Fungi and Plant InteractionsFrench-language works237,207