AN ANALYTICAL APPROACH TO RELIABILITY ESTIMATION OF MOBILE AGENT-BASED SYSTEMS
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Reliability estimation of mobile agent-based systems remains a difficult task due to the characteristics of mobile agents that include distributed and asynchronous execution, autonomy, and mobility. In this paper we present an analytical approach to estimate the reliability of mobile agent-based systems. We define the reliability of a mobile agent in terms of the processor execution time required to perform agent's tasks at each processing node and the transmission or communication time needed to transfer the agent from one processing node to another via a network to complete its mission. The failure of entire components causes failure of the agent. Simulation experiments have been conducted using stochastic Petri Nets modeling. We investigate the effect of different component reliability and availability models (processors and links) on the system throughput. The results we have obtained demonstrate the impact of different reliability and availability models on the system throughput.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it