Permanent and temporary phonological influences in Slovenian irregular verb production
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AbstractLexical access in language production shows effects of permanent statistical properties of the lexicon, but also of temporary phonological influences of words produced in the same sentence. In this study of present-tense verbs in Slovene, conjoining an irregular and a regular form, where both verbs have the same base-final consonant, leads to a dramatic increase in the error rate, both over-regularisation of irregulars and over-irregularisation of regulars. A further degree of similarity (rhyming) affects only over-irregularisation of regular verbs. Another experiment explores output biases in purely phonological errors, to help clarify the nature of the interference during processing. The strong effect of temporary phonological influences on the processing of irregular forms provides new details about that process, but is less informative about the mechanisms for regulars.Keywords: language productionprimingirregular morphologyphonology–morphology interactionsPalatal Bias FundingThis research was supported by a Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council Discovery Grant to the second author.Additional informationFundingFunding: This research was supported by a Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council Discovery Grant to the second author.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it