MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2047383201 · doi:10.1175/mwr3436.1

Short-Range Forecast Impact from Assimilation of GPS-IPW Observations into the Rapid Update Cycle

2007· article· en· W2047383201 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueMonthly Weather Review · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGNSS positioning and interference
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsData assimilationGlobal Positioning SystemEnvironmental scienceRadiosondeMeteorologySatellitePrecipitable waterClimatologyGeographyComputer sciencePrecipitationGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Integrated precipitable water (IPW) estimates derived from time delays in the arrival of global positioning system (GPS) satellite signals are a relatively recent, high-frequency source of atmospheric moisture information available for real-time data assimilation. Different experimental versions of the Rapid Update Cycle (RUC) have assimilated these observations to assess GPS-IPW impact on moisture forecasts. In these tests, GPS-IPW data have proven to be a useful real-time source of moisture information, leading to more accurate short-range moisture forecasts when added to other observations. A multiyear experiment with parallel (one with GPS-IPW processed 24 h after the fact, one without) 3-h cycles using the original 60-km RUC was run from 1999 to 2004 with verification of each cycle against rawinsonde observations. This experiment showed a steady increase in the positive impact in short-range relative humidity (RH) forecasts due to the GPS-IPW data as the number of observing sites increased from 18 to almost 300 (as of 2004) across the United States and Canada. Positive impact from GPS-IPW on 850–700-hPa RH forecasts was also evident in 6- and 12-h forecasts. The impact of GPS-IPW data was also examined on forecasts from the more recent 20-km RUC, including a 1-h assimilation cycle and improved assimilation and physical parameterizations, now using real-time GPS-IPW retrievals available 30 min after valid time. In a 3-month comparison during the March–May 2004 period, 20-km RUC cycles with and without assimilation of GPS-IPW were compared with IPW for 3-, 6-, 9-, and 12-h forecasts. Using this measure, assimilation of GPS-IPW data led to the strongest improvements in the 3- and 6-h forecasts and smaller but still evident improvements in 9- and 12-h forecasts. In a severe convective weather case, inclusion of GPS-IPW data improved forecasts of convective available potential energy, an important predictor of severe storm potential, and relative humidity. Positive impact from GPS-IPW assimilation was found to vary over season, geographical location, and time of day, apparently related to variations in vertical mixing. For example, GPS-IPW has a stronger effect on improving RH forecasts at 850 hPa at nighttime (than daytime) and in cooler seasons (than warmer seasons) when surface moisture observations are less representative of conditions aloft. As a result of these studies, assimilation of GPS-IPW was added to the operational RUC run at NOAA/NCEP in June 2005 and to the operational North American Mesoscale model (also at NCEP) in June 2006 to improve their accuracy for short-range moisture forecasts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.897
Threshold uncertainty score0.404

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it