MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2047751098 · doi:10.1145/1569901.1570052

Genetic programming based image segmentation with applications to biomedical object detection

2009· article· en· W2047751098 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicEvolutionary Algorithms and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaWestern UniversityConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceSegmentation-based object categorizationImage segmentationArtificial intelligenceScale-space segmentationSegmentationComputer visionMATLABGenetic programmingObject (grammar)Image (mathematics)Object detectionProcess (computing)Image textureImage processingPattern recognition (psychology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Image segmentation is an essential process in many image analysis applications and is mainly used for automatic object recognition purposes. In this paper, we define a new genetic programming based image segmentation algorithm (GPIS). It uses a primitive image-operator based approach to produce linear sequences of MATLAB® code for image segmentation. We describe the evolutionary architecture of the approach and present results obtained after testing the algorithm on a biomedical image database for cell segmentation. We also compare our results with another EC-based image segmentation tool called GENIE Pro. We found the results obtained using GPIS were more accurate as compared to GENIE Pro. In addition, our approach is simpler to apply and evolved programs are available to anyone with access to MATLAB®.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.943
Threshold uncertainty score0.304

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEvolutionary Algorithms and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207