MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2048036595 · doi:10.1002/cjce.22076

Demineralization of glucose solutions by electrodialysis: Influence of the ionic composition on the mass transfer and process performances

2014· article· en· W2048036595 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMembrane-based Ion Separation Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectrodialysisChemistryElectrolyteDiffusionIonic bondingConvectionMass transferIonFlux (metallurgy)OsmosisWork (physics)MembraneAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Chemical engineeringThermodynamicsChromatographyPhysical chemistryOrganic chemistryBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The aim of the present work was to investigate the influence of the ionic composition on the demineralization of a saccharide solution containing glucose. Experiments were carried out in order to evaluate the influence of the ionic composition on the solvent and solutes fluxes (glucose and electrolytes) through the membrane under different conditions (ionic compositions: NaCl, Na 2 SO 4 and CaCl 2 ; with or without current). From diffusion experiments (without current), it was shown that the glucose diffusion flux decreases for increasing ion hydration. These results are in agreement with those obtained in a previous work showing that the transfer modification reflects changes in the membrane properties associated with the hydration of its counter‐ion which is likely linked to swelling mechanisms at a microscopic scale. From the experiments carried out in normal ED conditions (with current) an additional convective contribution was pointed out. This kind of result is rather scarce in the literature. The glucose flux was then the sum of two contributions: diffusion and convection, due to the electro‐osmotic flux which is proportional to the electrical current. The contribution of the glucose convection flux on the overall glucose transfer was ranged between 70 and 90 % according to the electrolyte nature (NaCl, Na 2 SO 4 and CaCl 2 ) and the electric current (150 or 300 A m −2 ). The variation of the convective flux has been further correlated to the hydration of the ions. Indeed increasing convection fluxes were obtained for decreasing anion (or cation) hydration. It was shown that the saccharide transfer increases in presence of salts and that this increase was correlated to the saccharide dehydration in presence of electrolyte. Finally, the solvent, ions and glucose fluxes were used to calculate the glucose loss factor versus the demineralization factor to evaluate the influence of the electrolyte nature on the demineralization process performances. It was observed that, for a fixed demineralization factor, the glucose loss factor (comprised between 4 and 5 % for a demineralization factor of 90 %) increased with the ion hydration due to the higher contribution of the glucose convection flux.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.249
Threshold uncertainty score0.191

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.175
Teacher spread0.171 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it