Electricity Consumption, Technological Innovation, Economic Growth and Energy Prices: Does Energy Export Dependency and Development Levels Matter?
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Empirical evidences appear to substantiate the hypothesis that electricity consumption is casually linked to economic growth in both the short and the long run. Nevertheless, incorporating new variables on examining the traditional electricity-growth nexus is relatively underdeveloped. This study uses annual data from 1974 to 2011 to examine the long-term and short-term relationship among electricity consumption, economic growth, energy prices and technological innovation for Canada, Ecuador, Norway and South Africa. These countries were selected on the basis of energy export dependency and development level. Based on the results derived from the methodology of ARDL and VECM, they suggest that developing economies should not simply reduce their consumption on fossil fuel powered electricity. Although technological innovation does not significantly influence the long-term variation in fossil fuel powered electricity, it is bilaterally tied with economic growth for all countries. This result indicates the applicability of the endogenous growth theory on the electricity-growth nexus.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it