MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2048147694 · doi:10.5539/mas.v3n4p19

Markov Chain Monte Carlo-Based Bayesian Analysis of Binary Response Regression, with Illustration in Dose-Response Assessment

2009· article· en· W2048147694 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueModern Applied Science · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicOptimal Experimental Design Methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMarkov chain Monte CarloComputer scienceBayesian probabilityMonte Carlo methodMarkov chainBayesian inferenceMetropolis–Hastings algorithmStatisticsMathematicsArtificial intelligenceMachine learning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper deals with the Bayesian analysis of binary response regression using Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods, more specifically the Metropolis sampler, for posterior simulation. The methodology is illustrated with real-world data from a bioassay experiment. Inference about quantities of typical interest in the dose-response setting such as the lethal dose is discussed as well. MCMC are routinely implemented through popular Bayesian software such as Win-/Open-BUGS. However, these remain black boxes which provide no insight in the estimation procedure. This paper exemplifies that developing and implementing an MCMC sampler may, in many practical situations, be relatively straightforward. The R code for the Metropolis sampler is also provided in an appendix to the paper.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.027
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.824
Threshold uncertainty score0.953

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0270.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.011
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.414
Teacher spread0.351 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it