Multiple sclerosis and academic work: Socio‐spatial strategies adopted to maintain employment
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Maintaining paid work and the occupational identity it entails after onset of multiple sclerosis is important and beneficial. Research consistently shows that employees with multiple sclerosis who are more highly educated and in positions with greater occupational prestige are more likely to remain in the workforce. We ask: what is it about the specific workplaces in which such workers are employed that facilitates these employment outcomes? To answer this question we conducted an exploratory pilot study involving 10 semi‐structured interviews with Canadian academics with multiple sclerosis. Respondents’ adoption of socio‐spatials trategies related to travel, spatio‐temporalr outines, and social networks was central to maintaining a place in the academic workforce. Factors such as flexibility, access to resources, and symptom fluctuation enabled these strategies. The findings show that the relationships between place and occupation are complex in that multiple physical and social spaces and also roles are invoked in maintaining a particular occupational identity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it