MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2048616123 · doi:10.1109/isit.2007.4557460

Synchronizing block codes with a decoder for variable-length codes

2007· article· en· W2048616123 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCellular Automata and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBlock codeSynchronizingSynchronization (alternating current)Decoding methodsLinear codeBounded functionCode (set theory)Computer scienceAlgorithmDiscrete mathematicsConcatenated error correction codeFountain codeMathematicsCombinatoricsTopology (electrical circuits)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It is well known that any two non-identical codewords from a fixed-length code must belong to different non- periodic equivalence classes under cyclic shift for the code to have a bounded synchronization delay (BSD). Subsets of fixed- length codewords from T-codes, a family of variable-length codes (VLCs) known for strong statistical self-synchronization and a well-explained synchronization model, also follow this rule, albeit with some periodic exceptions. This paper shows how the T-code construction algorithm may be used for the simple construction of maximal block codes with bounded synchronization delay. These self-synchronizing codes are subsets of T-codes and thus resynchronization under decoding with a T-code decoder is both automatic and detectable.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.964
Threshold uncertainty score0.349

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCellular Automata and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207