MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2048616123 · doi:10.1109/isit.2007.4557460

Synchronizing block codes with a decoder for variable-length codes

2007· article· en· W2048616123 on OpenAlexaff
Ulrich Speidel, Aaron Gulliver

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCellular Automata and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBlock codeSynchronizingSynchronization (alternating current)Decoding methodsLinear codeBounded functionCode (set theory)Computer scienceAlgorithmDiscrete mathematicsConcatenated error correction codeFountain codeMathematicsCombinatoricsTopology (electrical circuits)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It is well known that any two non-identical codewords from a fixed-length code must belong to different non- periodic equivalence classes under cyclic shift for the code to have a bounded synchronization delay (BSD). Subsets of fixed- length codewords from T-codes, a family of variable-length codes (VLCs) known for strong statistical self-synchronization and a well-explained synchronization model, also follow this rule, albeit with some periodic exceptions. This paper shows how the T-code construction algorithm may be used for the simple construction of maximal block codes with bounded synchronization delay. These self-synchronizing codes are subsets of T-codes and thus resynchronization under decoding with a T-code decoder is both automatic and detectable.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCellular Automata and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207