MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2048796614 · doi:10.1109/tmtt.2014.2299521

Wideband Second-Order Adjoint Sensitivity Analysis Exploiting TLM

2014· article· en· W2048796614 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectromagnetic Simulation and Numerical Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHessian matrixClassification of discontinuitiesWidebandSensitivity (control systems)Scattering parametersApplied mathematicsMathematicsTransmission lineFunction (biology)AlgorithmEnergy (signal processing)Finite-difference time-domain methodFinite difference methodElectric power transmissionMathematical analysisElectronic engineeringTopology (electrical circuits)Computer sciencePhysicsEngineeringOpticsTelecommunicationsCombinatoricsStatisticsElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present, for the first time, an efficient adjoint variable method (AVM) for estimating second-order sensitivities exploiting time-domain transmission-line modeling. For a structure with n designable parameters, the complete Hessian matrix of any desired objective function is estimated using n extra simulations as compared to O(n <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sup> ) using the traditional finite-difference approaches. Our approach is illustrated through estimating the second-order sensitivities for energy functions and scattering parameter with respect to dimensions and material properties of metallic and dielectric discontinuities. The results achieved using our AVM approach are verified using the expensive finite-difference approaches.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.766
Threshold uncertainty score0.704

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it