MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2048898138 · doi:10.1080/17513750701769899

The importance of census times in discrete-time growth-dispersal models

2008· article· en· W2048898138 on OpenAlexaff
Frithjof Lutscher, Sergei Petrovskii

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Biological Dynamics · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology Models
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiological dispersalEcologyFocus (optics)PopulationCensusPopulation ecologyGeographyEconometricsStatistical physicsBiologyMathematicsDemographySociologyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dispersal has been the focus of spatial ecology for a few decades. What should be a proper theoretical framework for understanding and modelling of dispersal processes remains a controversial issue though. Integrodifference equations (IDE) model the spatial dynamics of a population with distinct growth and dispersal stages in their life cycle. Depending on the stage observed, the equations take on different forms, only one of which is usually studied in the literature. Here we reveal that while these different forms are mathematically equivalent, the biological conclusions drawn from the different forms may differ considerably. We provide a summary of similarities and differences and point out the greatest potential caveats when applying IDE.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.068
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.033

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.068
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.008
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Biological DynamicsSame topicMathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology ModelsFrench-language works237,207