MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2049197770 · doi:10.1109/plans.2010.5507258

Improving carrier phase reacquisition using advanced receiver architectures

2010· article· en· W2049197770 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE/ION Position, Location and Navigation Symposium · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGNSS positioning and interference
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersWestern Economic Diversification CanadaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaGeneral Motors of Canada
KeywordsGNSS applicationsComputer scienceLock (firearm)Process (computing)Carrier recoveryPhase (matter)Real-time computingTracking (education)DemodulationEngineeringTelecommunicationsGlobal Positioning System

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper employs advanced GNSS receiver architectures to more quickly reacquire the carrier phase data after a loss of lock. Specifically, a piece-wise control method and a phase prediction architecture are proposed. The piece-wise method takes advantage of different parameters in the control system to produce different transition performance within the tracking loop. With this in mind, the approach divides the reacquisition process into separate periods each with different control system parameters in order to achieve a faster transition process. In the phase prediction architecture, carrier phase measurements are predicted for satellites that have lost lock by integrating the estimated Doppler computed from the navigation solution. Predicted phase quality is evaluated in both empirical and theoretical ways. All algorithms are tested using real data collected under mild to moderate operational conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.225
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it