MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2049679772 · doi:10.1109/glocom.2011.6134237

Reducing Handoff Latency for NEMO-Based Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks

2011· article· en· W2049679772 on OpenAlexaff
Azzedine Boukerche, Zhenxia Zhang, Fei Xin

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIPv6, Mobility, Handover, Networks, Security
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer networkHandoverComputer scienceWireless ad hoc networkVehicular ad hoc networkWireless networkJitterWirelessLatency (audio)Mobile ad hoc networkNetwork packetTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In a vehicular ad hoc network, vehicles can communicate with their correspondent nodes through the Internet using various wireless technologies. This kind of wireless networks brings a lot of new applications to metropolitan networks, such as online games, VoIP, etc. However, compared with traditional wireless networks, the high speed of vehicles and the limited transmission range of antennas introduce more frequent handoffs. During the handoff, vehicles have to switch their access points to establish new connections and the current wireless communications will be ceased temporarily. Therefore, long handoff latency causes poor throughput and obvious jitter. In this paper, a fast handoff scheme is proposed for vehicular networks. Using this scheme, vehicles are divided into different clusters; and within each cluster, the network mobility solution is used to reduce the total number of handoffs. Moreover, before the mobile routers start actual handoff process, they can receive their new care of addresses through assistant nodes in the same cluster. Simulation results demonstrate that handoff latency can be significantly reduced by our scheme.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIPv6, Mobility, Handover, Networks, SecurityFrench-language works237,207