MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Teaching &amp; Learning Guide for: Men Who Weep and Wail: Masculinity and Emotion in Sidney's <i>New Arcadia</i>

2008· article· en· W2049826059 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueLiterature Compass · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLiterature: history, themes, analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMasculinityArcadiaContext (archaeology)PassionPsychologyPassionsLiteratureFemininityLiterary criticismPsychoanalysisArtHistorySocial psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Author's Introduction In this Teaching and Learning Guide I include my essay ‘Men Who Weep and Wail: Masculinity and Emotion in Sidney's New Arcadia ’ in a Sixteenth‐Century Major Writers course on Sidney, Spenser, Marlowe, and Shakespeare aimed at upper‐level undergraduates and graduate students. This course examines poetry and prose by these writers in roughly chronological order and offers a selection of primary and secondary readings that situates these texts in their literary and historical context and in relation to recent critical works on emotion and masculinity, subjects that have generated considerable critical interest over the past decade. Studies of emotion, which the early moderns described as bodily passions, have become popular in literary studies, cultural history, philosophy, and anthropology among other disciplines. The growing interest of literary critics in the issue of masculinity complements the sustained critical interest in femininity and feminism in gender studies. The broadening of the field of gender studies to include men's as well as women's studies challenges the misleading association of men with the mind and women with the body and avoids perpetuating the illusion that men are the ungendered sex. Recently, literary critics have explored the topic of masculinity extensively with respect to Shakespeare's plays but less so in relation to poetry and prose by his contemporaries. In my essay on emotionally expressive men in Sidney's New Arcadia I demonstrate when, where, how, and to what extent male expressions of desire, grief, anger, melancholy, and pity function as sources of strength rather than weakness. This essay thereby reveals that stoicism and self‐restraint are not always masculine qualities and that emotional demonstrativeness and hysteria are not necessarily feminine or debilitating traits in early modern texts. Author Recommends: General Early Modern Criticism: Early Modern English Poetry: A Critical Companion , eds. Patrick Cheney, Andrew Hadfield, and Garrett A. Sullivan (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006) provides twenty‐eight original essays that examine major poems by Spenser, Sidney, Wroth, Marlowe, and Shakespeare among other sixteenth‐ and seventeenth‐century writers in relation to topics ranging from literary genres, modes, and Petrarchism to the body, sexuality, and homoeroticism. Secondary Works on Emotion: The interdisciplinary collection Reading the Early Modern Passions: Essays in the Cultural History of Emotion, ed. Gail Kern Paster, Katherine Rowe, and Mary Floyd‐Wilson (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2004) focuses on the meanings and representations of emotion in Renaissance literature, music, and art. In Bodies and Selves in Early Modern England: Physiology and Inwardness in Spenser, Shakespeare, Herbert, and Milton (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000) Michael Schoenfeldt explores the close link between psychological inwardness and corporeal processes in English Renaissance literature that resulted from the early modern medical paradigm of the passions as governed by the bodily humors. In The Gendering of Melancholia: Feminism, Psychoanalysis, and the Symbolics of Loss in Renaissance Literature (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1992) Juliana Schiesari argues that melancholia often functions as a sign of elite exceptionality in men but that women's grief is often a figure for the illness of depression and is thereby disparaged. In ‘ The Countess of Pembroke's Arcadia and Its (Com)Passionate Women Readers’, Gender and Authorship in the Sidney Circle (Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press, 1990) Mary Ellen Lamb demonstrates that Sir Philip Sidney presents passion, which is often associated with feminine displays of affect, as a positive trait that motivates heroic constancy for both sexes in the New Arcadia . Secondary Works on Masculinity: Shakespeare and Masculinity (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000) by Bruce Smith provides a vital, exemplary introduction to the study of masculinity and early modern theories of the bodily humors and gender. In Anxious Masculinity in Early Modern Europe (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996) Mark Breitenberg examines the dialectic of anxiety and desire for masculine subjects in works by Shakespeare, Bacon, Burton, and women writers. In ‘Early Modern Masculinities and The Faerie Queene ’, English Literary Renaissance 35.2 (2005): 210–47 Lisa Celovksy addresses the gap in gender and feminist approaches to Spenser studies by examining what it means to be a man in his epic romance. General Reference: The Spenser Encylopedia , eds. A. C. Hamilton et al. (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1990) is an indispensable reference tool offering over 700 entries on Spenser's life, works, and literary influences. Online Materials: See the portraits of Queen Elizabeth I and the Armada Portrait in particular in relation to her ‘Speech to the Troops at Tilbury’ at http://www.biocrawler.com/encyclopedia/Elizabeth_I_of_England . The Sidney Homepage at http://www.english.cam.ac.uk/sidney provides links to The Sidney Journal , the Sidney‐Spenser Discussion List, and on‐line resources on Sidney's texts, biographies, and bibliographies of literary criticism on his works. See the Sir Philip Sidney World Bibliography at http://bibs.slu.edu/sidney/index.html for annotated bibliographies about Sidney's life and work. The Edmund Spenser Homepage at http://www.english.cam.ac.uk/spenser/main.htm offers a biography and bibliography about Spenser as well as useful links to Spenser journals, discussion lists, and other Renaissance authors, journals, research libraries, and archives. See the Edmund Spenser World Bibliography at http://bibs.slu.edu/spenser/index.html for bibliographies, abstracts, and book reviews from Spenser Studies and The Spenser Review . See the Images of St. George Throughout the Ages: Western Art in relation to Redcrosse's battle with the dragon in Book I of <jats:itali

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.690
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it