MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2049867669 · doi:10.4296/cwrj3302195

Statistical Models and the Estimation of Low Flows

2008· article· en· W2049867669 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Water Resources Journal / Revue canadienne des ressources hydriques · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHydrology and Watershed Management Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsGeographyEstimationGeologyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La présente communication offre un bref survol des modèles statistiques couramment utilisés pour l'estimation des basses eaux tant à des sites offrant un enregistrement fiable des débits d'un cours d'eau qu'à des sites éloignés des sources de données. Des possibilités d'estimation régionale des caractéristiques des basses eaux dans des sites non jaugés sont décrites. L'adaptation de l'approche de régionalisation par voisinage, couramment employée dans l'analyse régionale de la fréquence des crues, peut être étendue aux variables des basses eaux. Sont également décrites certaines approches d'estimation qui accroissent l'utilité des données sur les décrues dans l'analyse régionale de la fréquence des basses eaux pour des sites non jaugés, et ce, à l'aide d'une approche de l'analyse de corrélation canonique pour l'identification des voisinages hydrologiques. Il est aussi question de la validité des paramètres de décrue lorsque les estimations reposent sur des enregistrements de données hydrologiques s'étalant sur de très courtes périodes. De nouvelles orientations prometteuses pour les recherches futures dans le domaine de l'estimation statistique de la fréquence de l'étiage sont également dégagées. <h2>Abstract</h2> The present paper provides a brief review of statistical models that are commonly used in the estimation of low flows both at sites with a reliable streamflow record and sites remote from data sources. Opportunities are identified for the regional estimation of low-flow characteristics at ungauged sites. <br/> The adaptation of the neighbourhood regionalization approach, commonly used in regional flood frequency analysis, can be extended to low-flow variables. Estimation approaches extending the usefulness of recession information in regional low-flow frequency analysis to ungauged sites using a canonical correlation analysis approach for the identification of hydrological neighbourhoods is described. The validity of recession parameters when estimated from very short hydrological data records is also discussed. Promising new directions for future research in the field of statistical low-flow frequency estimation are identified.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.794
Threshold uncertainty score0.967

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.189
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it