MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2050129686 · doi:10.1017/s0373463307004663

Regional Stochastic Models for NOAA-Based Residual Tropospheric Delays

2008· article· en· W2050129686 on OpenAlexafffund
Hassan E. Ibrahim, Ahmed El‐Rabbany

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Navigation · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGNSS positioning and interference
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
FundersNOAA ResearchOntario Centres of Excellence
KeywordsResidualTroposphereCovarianceCovariance functionMeteorologyInterpolation (computer graphics)MathematicsEnvironmental scienceComputer scienceStatisticsAlgorithmGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Real-time and near real-time precise GPS positioning requires shorter GPS solution convergence time. Residual tropospheric delay, which exists as a result of the limitations of existing tropospheric correction models, is a limiting factor for quick GPS solution convergence. This paper proposes a new approach to tropospheric delay modelling, which overcomes the limitations of existing models. In this approach, the bulk of the tropospheric delay is accounted for using the NOAA-generated tropospheric correction model, while the residual tropospheric delay component is accounted for stochastically. First, the NOAA tropospheric correction model is used to generate daily time series of zenith total tropospheric delays (ZTDs) at ten IGS reference stations spanning North America for many days in 2006. The NOAA ZTDs are then compared with the new highly-accurate IGS tropospheric delay product to obtain daily residual time series at 5 minute intervals. Finally, the auto-covariance functions of the daily residual tropospheric delay series are estimated at each of the ten reference stations and then used to find the best empirical covariance function in the least squares sense. Of the three potential covariance functions examined, it is shown that the exponential cosine function gives the best fit most of the time, while the second-order Gauss-Markov model gives the worst fit. The first-order Gauss-Markov fits are close to those of the exponential cosine. Additionally, the model coefficients seem to be season independent, but change with geographical location.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.066
Threshold uncertainty score0.132

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of NavigationSame topicGNSS positioning and interferenceFrench-language works237,207