MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2050197176 · doi:10.2307/3590967

The Future of Private Sector Unionism in the United States

2003· article· en· W2050197176 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Richard P. Chaykowski, James T. Bennett, Bruce E. Kaufman

Bibliographic record

VenueIndustrial and Labor Relations Review · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLabor Movements and Unions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrivate sectorPoliticsWageValue (mathematics)Industrial relationsPolitical scienceManagementSociologyEconomic historyLawEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Preface 1. Introduction 2. The Future of Private Sector Unions in the U.S., Seymour Martin Lipset and Ivan Katchanovski 3. Accounting for the Decline of Unions in the Private Sector, 1973-1988, Henry Farber and Bruce Western 4. The Twilight for Organized Labor, Leo Troy 5. Information Technology, Unions, and the New Organization: Challenges and Opportunities for Union Survival, Anthony Townsend, Samuel DeMarie, and Anthony Hendrickson 6. Private Sector Union Density and the Wage Premium: Past, Present, and Future, Barry Hirsch and Edward Schumacher 7. Unionism as Value-Adding Networks: Possibilities for the Future of U.S. Unionism, Saul Rubinstein 8. The Fall and Future of Unionism in Construction, A.J. Thieblot 9. Learning from Each Other: A European Perspective on American Labor, Edmund Heery 10. Labor's Love Lost? Changes in the U.S. Environment and Declining Private Sector Unionism, Edward Potter 11. Human Resource Management Practices and Worker Desires for Union Representation, Jack Fiorito 12. New Strategies for Union Survival and Revival, Nancy Mills 13. Labor Unions: Victims of Their Own Political Success? James Bennett and Jason Taylor 14. Mandatory Agency Shop Laws as an Explanation of Canada-U.S. Union Density Divergence, Daphne Taras and Allen Ponak 15. Intensity of Management Resistance: Understanding the Decline of Unionization in the Private Sector, Morris Kleiner 16. Strategy for Labor, Samuel Estreicher 17. The Future of Private Sector U.S. Unionism: Did George Barnett Get It Right After All? Bruce Kaufman 18. Conclusion

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.041
Threshold uncertainty score0.082

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0060.003
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0240.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations60
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIndustrial and Labor Relations ReviewSame topicLabor Movements and UnionsFrench-language works237,207