MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2050436065 · doi:10.1080/14634980802690873

Assessing historical versus contemporary mercury and lead contamination in Lake Huron sediments

2009· article· en· W2050436065 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueAquatic Ecosystem Health & Management · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSoil Geostatistics and Mapping
Canadian institutionsEnvironment and Climate Change CanadaToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKrigingEnvironmental scienceGeospatial analysisPollutionMercury (programming language)Structural basinBayHydrology (agriculture)SedimentShapefileSpatial analysisGeographic information systemContaminationPhysical geographyGeologyCartographyGeographyOceanographyRemote sensingStatisticsEcologyMetadataGeomorphology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This research utilized surficial sediment core sample data that were collected in 1969/1973 and 2002 from Lake Huron as part of the Environment Canada Great Lakes Sediment Assessment Program. Concentrations for mercury and lead were analyzed due their persistence in the lake ecosystem and their detrimental environmental effects. The analysis area included the main basin of Lake Huron, Georgian Bay, and the North Channel. Comprehending overall pollution levels strictly on the basis of point data is a difficult task, however spatial analysis techniques combined with Geographic Information Systems can be used to gain a better understanding of lake-wide trends. The Geostatistical Analyst extension of the ESRI ArcGIS software was used to carry out ordinary kriging analyses on the datasets. They produced statistically valid concentration estimates with log-normal data transformation procedures occasionally being performed to obtain suitable prediction estimates. Geospatial analysis (including kriging) allows for samples that vary in number and location to be analyzed and compared with each other based on areal estimates. Overall decreases in contamination levels were observed between the historical and contemporary surveys. Mercury has seen a dramatic reduction in concentrations from 1969/1973 to 2002, while the lead results indicate that high levels of contamination (compared to background concentrations) still persist in the contemporary dataset, although they have subsided from historic values. Higher contaminant concentrations were generally found in depositional basins. The interpolated kriging surfaces are more informative than i.e. conventional dot and/or proportional circle maps in the amount of information they present. They also provide an increased understanding of both the spatial distribution and temporal trends in sediment contamination in Lake Huron.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.912
Threshold uncertainty score0.604

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it