MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2050503192 · doi:10.1142/s021945540200049x

TRANSIENT RESPONSE OF VISCOELASTIC MOVING BELTS USING BLOCK-BY-BLOCK METHOD

2002· article· en· W2050503192 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Structural Stability and Dynamics · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVibration and Dynamic Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsViscoelasticityEigenfunctionTransient (computer programming)Block (permutation group theory)Transient responseConstitutive equationDifferential equationMathematical analysisAmplitudeMechanicsIntegral equationIntegral transformStandard linear solid modelMathematicsClassical mechanicsPhysicsStructural engineeringEigenvalues and eigenvectorsGeometryEngineeringComputer scienceFinite element methodOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The linear, viscoelastic, integral constitutive law is employed to model the viscoelastic characteristic of belt materials. By assuming the translating eigenfunctions instead of stationary eigenfunctions to be the spatial solutions, the governing equation is reduced to differential-integral equations in time, which are then solved by the block-by-block method. The transient amplitudes of parametrically excited viscoelastic moving belts with uniform and non-uniform travelling speed are obtained. The effects of viscoelastic parameters and perturbed axial velocity on the system response are also investigated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.168
Threshold uncertainty score0.454

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it