MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2050635843 · doi:10.1117/12.689113

Spectral angle mapper based assessment of detectability of man-made targets from hyperspectral imagery after SNR enhancement

2006· article· en· W2050635843 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRemote-Sensing Image Classification
Canadian institutionsDefence Research and Development CanadaCanadian Space Agency
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHyperspectral imagingRemote sensingData setComputer scienceSet (abstract data type)Image resolutionArtificial intelligenceFull spectral imagingSignal-to-noise ratio (imaging)Computer visionNoise (video)Near-infrared spectroscopyPattern recognition (psychology)Image (mathematics)GeologyOpticsPhysicsTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper assesses the effectiveness of a signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) enhancement technology for hyperspectral imagery to examine whether it can better serve remote sensing applications. A hyperspectral data set acquired using an airborne Short-wave-infrared Full Spectrum Image II with man-made targets in the scene of the data set was tested. Spectral angle mapper and end-members of different target materials were used to measure the superficies of the targets and to assess the detectability of the targets before and after applying the SNR enhancement technology to the data set. The experimental results show that small targets, which cannot be detected in the original data set due to inadequate SNR and low spatial resolution, can be detected after the SNR of the data set is enhanced.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.244
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it