MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2050895508 · doi:10.1142/s1005386706000563

Green's Relations on the Monoid of Regular Hypersubstitutions

2006· article· en· W2050895508 on OpenAlexaff
Th. Changphas, Shelly L. Wismath

Bibliographic record

VenueAlgebra Colloquium · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
Topicsemigroups and automata theory
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Lethbridge
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsSemigroupGalois connectionMonoidFree monoidType (biology)Syntactic monoidConnection (principal bundle)Pure mathematicsBicyclic semigroupCombinatoricsLattice (music)Discrete mathematicsAlgebra over a field

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The theory of hyperidentities and hypervarieties is based on the fact that the set Hyp (τ) of all hypersubstitutions of a fixed type τ forms a monoid, with a Galois connection between submonoids of this monoid and complete sublattices of the lattice of all varieties of type τ. For this reason, there is interest in studying the semigroup or monoid properties of Hyp (τ) and its submonoids. One approach is to study the five relations known as Green's relations definable on any semigroup. In this paper, we consider the type τ = (n) with one n-ary operation symbol for n≥ 1, and the submonoid Reg (n) of regular hypersubstitutions. We characterize Green's relations on every subsemigroup of Reg (n); then using this characterization we describe which subsemigroups of Reg (n) are 𝒢-subsemigroups of Reg (n) defined by Levi.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.187
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlgebra ColloquiumSame topicsemigroups and automata theoryFrench-language works237,207