MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2051220245 · doi:10.1142/s0219649207001822

Utilising Neural Network and Support Vector Machine for Gene Expression Classification

2007· article· en· W2051220245 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Information & Knowledge Management · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNeural Networks and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSupport vector machineComputer scienceArtificial neural networkArtificial intelligenceData miningProcess (computing)Machine learningKnowledge extractionSet (abstract data type)Data set

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bioinformatics is the science of managing, mining and interpreting information from biological sequences and structures. In this paper, we discuss two data-mining techniques that can be applied in bioinformatics: Neural Networks (NN) and Support Vector Machines (SVMs), and their application in gene expression classification. First, we provide a description of the two techniques. Then, we propose a new method that combines both SVM and NN. This way, we provide an effective knowledge management technique by utilising machine-learning techniques within the data-mining process. The knowledge obtained from the process is valuable as it is not possible to discover the same kind of knowledge using classical query processing or knowledge management techniques. Finally, we present the results obtained from our method and the results obtained from SVM alone on a sample data set.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.882
Threshold uncertainty score0.316

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it