MSE minimization and fault-tolerant data fusion for multi-sensor systems
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Multi-sensor data fusion is an efficient method to provide both accurate and fault-tolerant sensor readouts. Furthermore, detection of faults in a reasonably short amount of time is crucial for applications dealing with high risks. In order to deliver high accuracies for the sensor measurements, it is required to perform a calibration for each sensor. This paper focuses on designing a fault-tolerant calibrated multisensor system. First, the least squares method is applied to calibrate each sensor using a linear curve fitting function. Next, an analytical technique is proposed to carry out a fault-tolerant multi-sensor data fusion, while minimizing the Mean-Square-Error (MSE) for the final sensor readout. While our data fusion approach is applicable to different multi-sensor systems, the experimental results are shown for 16 temperature sensors, where an environmental thermal chamber was used as the reference model to calibrate the sensors and perform the measurements.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it