MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The relationship between cervical dilatation at initial presentation in labour and subsequent intervention

2001· article· en· W2051576840 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueBJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMaternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
Canadian institutionsBC Centre for Disease ControlOttawa HospitalUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCaesarean sectionCephalic presentationObstetricsApgar scorePresentation (obstetrics)Cervical dilatationGestationPregnancyVaginal deliveryOxytocinUterine ruptureCervixGynecologyBirth weightUterus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: To examine the relationship between the cervical dilatation at which women present in labour and the subsequent likelihood of caesarean section. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: University teaching hospital. POPULATION: 3,220 women met the entry criteria from 14,050 deliveries between January 1995 and December 1999. METHODS: Women meeting the following criteria were identified: those in spontaneous labour with a singleton pregnancy and a cephalic presentation at 37-42 weeks of gestation; all women delivering within 36 hours of first presentation were included. Women who had spontaneous rupture of the membranes before first attendance were excluded. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the rate of caesarean section. Secondary outcomes were operative vaginal delivery, fetal weight, cord pH, five minute Apgar score, length of labour, labour augmentation with oxytocin and epidural analgesia. RESULTS: The risk of caesarean section decreased with increasing cervical dilatation at presentation. This was true for nulliparous (n = 1,168) and parous women (n = 2,052). The caesarean section rate of nulliparous women presenting at 0-3cm (n = 812) was 10.3%, compared with 4.2% for those presenting at 4cm-10 cm (n = 356), and the mean duration of labour before presentation was 2.0 hours versus 4.5 hours, respectively (P = 0.0001). For parous women the caesarean section rates were 5.7% and 1.3%, respectively (P = 0.0001). There were significantly greater frequencies of use of oxytocin and epidural analgesia by women presenting earlier in labour. The caesarean section rate of 185 nulliparae (15.8%) who were initially allowed home was no different from those admitted immediately (9.2% vs 8.2%, P = 0.67). Similarly, 196 (9.5%) of multiparae went home and had a caesarean section rate of 3.6%, compared with 3.1% if admitted immediately (P = 0.76). CONCLUSIONS: Women who present to hospital at 0-3cm spend less time in labour before presentation and are more likely to have obstetric intervention than those presenting in more advanced labour. Outcomes were similar whether or not the woman was initially allowed home.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.042
Threshold uncertainty score0.476

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.086
GPT teacher head0.412
Teacher spread0.327 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it