MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2051675508 · doi:10.5414/cnp61261

The effect of an exercise program during hemodialysis on dialysis efficacy, blood pressure and quality of life in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients

2004· article· en· W2051675508 on OpenAlexaff
T L Parsons, Edwin B. Toffelmire, Cheryl E. King‐VanVlack

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Nephrology · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDialysis and Renal Disease Management
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineDialysisHemodialysisEnd stage renal diseaseBlood pressureDialysis adequacyQuality of life (healthcare)Physical therapyInternal medicineUrologyNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AIM: We wished to determine if an 8-week program of exercise during dialysis in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients would increase urea removal (enhance dialysis efficacy) with subsequent improvements in work performance and perception of quality of life, and/or alterations in cardiovascular status. METHODS: Self-care hemodialysis patients (EX, n = 6) performed cycle ergometry exercise 3 times per week during their dialysis session at 40-50% maximal work capacity for 15 min during each of the first 3 hours of dialysis and were matched for age, protein catabolism rate, and WLmax with a CON group (n = 7). Dialysis efficacy was measured using serum urea clearance (Kt/V) and dialysate urea clearance (DUC) during the first 2 hours of dialysis. Resting blood pressure was monitored on a sessional basis, pre- and postdialysis and during exercise in the EX group. QOL, measured using the SF-36 questionnaire, and WLmax were determined prior to and at 4 and 8 weeks of the exercise program. RESULTS: DUC was significantly elevated in the EX group at the end of the exercise program, but was of insufficient magnitude to result in an overall increase in Kt/V. DUC decreased in the CON group but Kt/V remained unchanged. No changes in resting blood pressure occurred in either group over the course of the study, however, pulse pressure tended to increase in the CON group but decrease in the EX group, indicating a potential beneficial adaptation of the cardiovascular system in patients undergoing an exercise program. The exercise program had no effect on QOL scores and this was most likely due to the short duration of the exercise program and high-functioning level of the population studied as compared to normative data for this patient population. We also found that 33% of the exercise sessions in the 3rd hour of dialysis were not performed due to hypotensive events. CONCLUSION: Exercise during dialysis enhanced dialysate urea removal but not serum urea clearance. Alterations in the modality and the timing of exercise during dialysis may be required to elicit increases in serum urea clearance. It is also recommended that exercise during dialysis be performed during the first 2 hours of dialysis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.339
Teacher spread0.319 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations154
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical NephrologySame topicDialysis and Renal Disease ManagementFrench-language works237,207