MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2052237765 · doi:10.1080/09612020903282118

The Authority of Motherhood in Question: fatherhood and the moral education of children in England,<i>c.</i>1870–1900

2009· article· en· W2052237765 on OpenAlexaff
Stephanie Olsen

Bibliographic record

VenueWomen s History Review · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDomesticationIdeal (ethics)Rhetorical questionCentralityRelation (database)Gender studiesSociologyMoral educationExpression (computer science)PsychologyPolitical scienceLawLiteratureArtPedagogyBiologyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Late nineteenth‐century children were taught about their future roles through popular periodicals. Specifically, components of the manly domesticated father were highlighted: from the domestic goal of evangelical manliness, to the requirements of the ideal husband, the moral and pious centrality of the domesticated father, the rhetorical demonstration of fatherly failure and male weakness, and women’s duties in relation to domesticated manliness. The result is a clear expression of the significance of male domesticity in the era of supposed ‘flight’, and a call to historians to reconsider the importance usually ascribed to the moral influence of mothers at the expense of fathers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.076
Threshold uncertainty score0.152

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.006
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWomen s History ReviewSame topicHistorical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal ChangesFrench-language works237,207