MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2052237765 · doi:10.1080/09612020903282118

The Authority of Motherhood in Question: fatherhood and the moral education of children in England,<i>c.</i>1870–1900

2009· article· en· W2052237765 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueWomen s History Review · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDomesticationIdeal (ethics)Rhetorical questionCentralityRelation (database)Gender studiesSociologyMoral educationExpression (computer science)PsychologyPolitical scienceLawLiteratureArtPedagogyBiologyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Late nineteenth‐century children were taught about their future roles through popular periodicals. Specifically, components of the manly domesticated father were highlighted: from the domestic goal of evangelical manliness, to the requirements of the ideal husband, the moral and pious centrality of the domesticated father, the rhetorical demonstration of fatherly failure and male weakness, and women’s duties in relation to domesticated manliness. The result is a clear expression of the significance of male domesticity in the era of supposed ‘flight’, and a call to historians to reconsider the importance usually ascribed to the moral influence of mothers at the expense of fathers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.973
Threshold uncertainty score0.252

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it