MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W205229216

The 1988 Fires in Yellowstone: Charting Conservation in America

2008· article· en· W205229216 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Abby Dress

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Science Teacher · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFire effects on ecosystems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNational parkWildfire suppressionGeographyFirefightingEnvironmental scienceEcologyMeteorologyArchaeology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To commemorate the 20th anniversary of the 1988 fires at Yellowstone, still one of the largest wildfire events in the history of the United States, the Yellowstone Park Foundation has commissioned a poster--The 1988 Fires in Yellowstone--which accompanies this article. The poster elaborates on this extraordinary fire event with background information and conservation milestones. Beginning with the forest reserves that were set aside by the U.S. Navy in 1799 to protect hardwoods for its ships, the poster charts important conservation developments throughout U.S. history--a helpful resource for the classroom. Fire: A natural phenomenon Fire is a byproduct of a chemical reaction that occurs when combustible fuel comes into contact with oxygen at high temperatures. Periodic fires always have been integral to ecosystems by replacing and rebuilding nutrients in soil that plants and trees need to survive. While bacteria and fungi help decompose dead matter, such as leaves and fallen limbs on the ground, this happens somewhat slowly--fire speeds up the process. Today, wildfires seem to occur more frequently and dominate television and internet news coverage with imposing images, evacuation stories, and firefighting strategies. From California and Georgia to Alaska and New Jersey, no state appears to be immune from these conflagrations, according to statistics compiled by the National Interagency Fire Center (NIFC) (2007). Unfortunately, global warming and changed weather patterns may make conditions even riper for wildland fires. In addition, developments in close proximity to these very wildlands--whether public or private--fuel the flames and gain ongoing media attention. The recent fires in California are a case in point. Rebirth after fire at Yellowstone The 1988 fires at Yellowstone National Park burned 1.4 million acres in the tri-state areas of Wyoming, Montana, and Idaho--encompassing the greater Yellowstone area--and burned some 800,000 acres within the park itself (Franke 2000). The fires ignited debate about development in and around wildlands, fire policy in general, and suppression efforts of the National Park Service (NPS) and U.S. Forest Service. Just as importantly, the event brought the science of fire as a management tool to the front burner of national attention and scrutiny. Contrary to the popular belief publicized in government campaigns featuring Smokey Bear that most fires are caused by humans, forest fires in U.S. western lands and Canada typically are caused by lightning strikes in dry weather conditions, where there is an abundant source of combustible fuel (Franke 2000). Climate fluctuations have significantly affected the severity of these natural factors. As a result, it has become more important to understand the role of fire in wildland and forest management, particularly with the frequency of these flare-ups. Previously, managers and visitors alike typically viewed fires as destructive to Yellowstone, which was why park directives well into the 1960s emphasized firefighting as a priority over any other activity. However, in 1972, the NPS adopted a natural fire policy to accomplish management objectives, which helped perpetuate plants and animals native to a habitat through fire restoration (Barker 2005). This policy allowed a fire to burn until rain or lack of fuel extinguished it. But by 1988, Yellowstone's own fire policy could be overruled and protection applied if there were threats to visitor areas, endangerment to human life, or threats to lands managed by other agencies. Although reforestation of burn areas is in process at Yellowstone, it may take a century before trees charred by the 1988 fire are hidden by taller stands of trees. Grasslands have returned and sagebrush will be in development for another 20 or so years. Lodgepole pines are well established and, depending on the location, are 1-4 m high, though reforestation is uneven throughout the park. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.129
Threshold uncertainty score0.256

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0060.005
Scholarly communication0.0070.007
Open science0.0010.007
Research integrity0.0020.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Science TeacherSame topicFire effects on ecosystemsFrench-language works237,207