MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2052348439 · doi:10.1103/physreva.78.052510

Adaptive analytical mapping procedure for efficiently solving the radial Schrödinger equation

2008· article· en· W2052348439 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review A · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicNumerical methods for differential equations
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersRussian Foundation for Basic Research
KeywordsPhysicsEigenvalues and eigenvectorsSchrödinger equationFinite differenceVariable (mathematics)Finite difference methodApplied mathematicsDissociation (chemistry)Mathematical analysisMathematical physicsQuantum mechanicsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper shows that replacing the usual integration variable $r∊[0,\ensuremath{\infty})$ by a reduced radial variable $y\ensuremath{\equiv}y(r;\stackrel{P\vec}{\ensuremath{\alpha}})$ defined analytically on a finite domain $y∊[a,b]$ transforms the conventional radial Schr\"odinger equation into an equivalent form in which treatment of levels lying extremely close to dissociation becomes just as straightforward and routine as treating levels in the lower part of the potential well. Explicit integral expressions for the eigenvalue error due to the use of a finite step size in finite-difference methods of numerical integration are presented and are used to improve calculated eigenvalues as well as to determine optimal values of the mapping parameters $\stackrel{P\vec}{\ensuremath{\alpha}}$. This adaptive mapping procedure is shown to be versatile and efficient for both finite-difference and pseudospectral methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.826
Threshold uncertainty score0.811

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.222
GPT teacher head0.411
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it