Effective Mitigation of Shock Loads in Embedded Electronic Packaging Using Bilayered Potting Materials
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Shock loads which are characterized by high intensity, short duration, and vibration at varied frequencies can lead to the failure of embedded electronics typically used to operate/control numerous devices. Failure of electronics renders these devices ineffective, since they cannot carry out their intended function. It is therefore the objective of this work to determine the behavior of a typical electronic board assembly subject to severe shock loads and the means to protect the electronics. Specifically, three aspects of the work were considered using 3D finite element (FE) simulations in supercomputer environment. The first was concerned with the dynamic behavior of selected electronic devices subject to shock loads. The second with the ability of different potting materials to attenuate the considered shock loads. The third was with the use of a new bilayer potting configurations to effectively attenuate the shock load and vibration of the electronic board. The shock loads were delivered to the Joint Electron Device Engineering Council (JEDEC) standard board using simulated drop impact test. The effectiveness of different protective potting designs to attenuate the effect of shock loads was determined by considering the two key factors of electronics reliability: the stress in the interconnection and deformation of the printed circuit board. Our results reveal the remarkable effectiveness of the bilayer potting approach over the commonly adopted single potting attenuation strategy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".