MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2052464912 · doi:10.1007/bf03175543

Microbiological and chemical characterisations of organic and conventional date pastes (Phoenix dactylifera L.) from Tunisia

2008· article· en· W2052464912 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of Microbiology · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicDate Palm Research Studies
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhoenix dactyliferaFood sciencePasteurizationSugarMoistureWater contentCultivarChemistryPalm oilWater activityHorticultureBotanyPalmBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Chemical and microbiological properties of organic and conventional date pastes produced from the Deglet Nour cultivar were investigated. Significant differences were observed in water content, sugar profiles, and pH among the date pastes. The low moisture and the high acidity of organic date paste were two important positive attributes for its storage and potential manufacturing uses. Before pasteurisation, moulds CFU’s of the organic paste was significantly (P <0.01) lower than those of the conventional one but no significant differences were observed for yeasts, coliforms and the total aerobic flora among the two date pastes. Considerable interest has developed on the preservation of conventional date paste by the use of natural additives such asJuniperus phoenicea and olive oil (conditioned paste). At a given mixture ofJuniperus and olive oil and after pasteurisation, mould CFU’s were reduced by 95% (P <0.01) whereas the reduction was only 84% for the yeast populations, after 45 days at 25 °C.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.535
Threshold uncertainty score0.547

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it