MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2052752569 · doi:10.2166/ws.2011.028

The application of artificial neural networks for the optimization of coagulant dosage

2011· article· en· W2052752569 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueWater Science & Technology Water Supply · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWater Quality Monitoring Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAlumTurbidityFiltration (mathematics)Raw waterCoagulationWater treatmentEnvironmental scienceFilter (signal processing)Artificial neural networkEnvironmental engineeringPulp and paper industryChemistryMathematicsEngineeringStatisticsComputer scienceMachine learningEcologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Filtration is the final physical barrier preventing the passage of microbial pathogens into public drinking water. Proper pre-treatment via coagulation is essential for maintaining good particle removal during filtration. To improve filter performance at the Elgin Area WTP, artificial neural network (ANN) models were applied to optimize pre-filtration processes in terms of settled water turbidity and alum dosage. ANNs were successfully developed to predict future settled water turbidity based on seasonal raw water variables and chemical dosages, with correlation (R2) values ranging from 0.63 to 0.79. Additionally, inverse-process ANNs were developed to predict the optimal alum dosage required to achieve desired settled water turbidity, with correlation (R2) values ranging from 0.78 to 0.89.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.276
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.005
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it