PREVALENCE OF FACTOR V LEIDEN AND ACTIVATED PROTEIN C RESISTANCE IN CENTRAL RETINAL VEIN OCCLUSION
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: Factor V Leiden is a common inherited mutation that is a significant risk factor for deep vein thrombosis. It results in resistance to activated protein C (APC). The association between factor V Leiden and central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) remains controversial. This study was designed to determine the prevalence of APC resistance and the factor V Leiden mutation in patients with CRVO in a controlled study. METHODS: The study was designed as a case control study conducted in a tertiary care retina practice. The prevalence of APC resistance and factor V Leiden was determined by genetic testing of blood samples obtained from patients with CRVO and clinic control patients. RESULTS: Factor V Leiden was identified in 2.3% of patients with CRVO and 3.5% of clinic control patients. There was no significant association between the presence of factor V Leiden and CRVO (odds ratio, 1.13; 95% confidence interval, 0.65-1.98; P = 0.66). CONCLUSION: Factor V Leiden does not appear to be associated with CRVO. Routine screening of patients with CRVO does not appear to be warranted.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".